Quality Assessment Questions
| Code | Questions | Answer (Score) |
| QC1. | Were the aims and
objective clearly repoted? |
1 - Aims, objectives
and rationale are clearly reported 0.5 - Aims and objectives are reported, rationalre is missing 0 - Aims, objective and rationale missing |
| QC2. | Has the context been
described? |
1 - The context of a
study is described 0 - Not described |
| QC3. | Was the article
refereed? |
1 - Yes 0.5 - Lightly referred 0 - No |
| QC4. | Was the research design
suitable to address the goals fo the research? |
1 - Yes 0 - No |
| QC5. | Were possible
cofounders sufficiently controlled for the analysis? |
1 - Yes, completely 0.5 - Partially 0 - No |
| QC6. | Were Threats to
validity adequately discusses? |
1 - The article
discusses about the threat to validity 0.5 - Some threats are discussed, but not all 0 - The article is missing threats to validity |
| QC7. | Were the variables of
the measurement defined? |
1 - The variables are described
0 - One or more variables are not
defined
|
| QC8. | Were data collection
method described? |
1 - The data collection method has
been described
0.5 - Either the source or the
method is not described
0 - Neither the source nor the
method is described
|
| QC9. | Was the data collection
carried out properly? |
1 - Yes
0 - No
|
| QC10. | Was there a sufficient
description of the data analysis and interpretation methods? |
1 - Yes 0 - No |
| QC11. | Were data analysis
methods appropriate given research questions and available data? |
1 - Yes
0 - No
|
| QC12. | Were the conclusions
valid based on the analysis provided? |
1 - Yes
0.5 - Partially
0 - No
|