Identification and Prioritization of SLR Search ToolRequirements: an SLR and a Survey

Study

Reference

S1

Li, Z., Liang, P., & Avgeriou, P. (2013). Application of knowledge-based approaches in software architecture: A systematic mapping study.Information and Software Technology, 55(5), 777-794.

S2

Manuel D. D. D. ., Walquiria C. B. L., Eric B. P. M. (2014). An Approach and a Tool for Systematic Review Research. ICSEA 2014: The Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances.

S3

Mehmood, A., & Jawawi, D. N. (2013). Aspect-oriented model-driven code generation: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 55(2), 395-411.

S4

Khan, S. U., Niazi, M., & Ahmad, R. (2011). Barriers in the selection of offshore software development outsourcing vendors: An exploratory study using a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology,53(7), 693-706.

S5

Cavalcanti, Y. C., Mota Silveira Neto, P. A., Machado, I. D. C., Vale, T. F., Almeida, E. S., & Meira, S. R. D. L. (2014). Challenges and opportunities for software change request repositories: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 26(7), 620-653.

S6

da Silva, F. Q., Costa, C., Franca, A. C. C., & Prikladinicki, R. (2010, August). Challenges and solutions in distributed software development project management: a systematic literature review. In Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), 2010 5th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 87-96). IEEE.

S7

Dieste, O., Grimán, A., & Juristo, N. (2009). Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments. Empirical Software Engineering, 14(5), 513-539.

S8

Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 463-479.

S9

Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., & Budgen, D. (2010, May). The educational value of mapping studies of software engineering literature. In Software Engineering, 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 589-598). IEEE.

S10

Fernández-Sáez, A. M., Genero, M., & Chaudron, M. R. (2013). Empirical studies concerning the maintenance of UML diagrams and their use in the maintenance of code: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 55(7), 1119-1142.

S11

Riņķevičs, K., & Torkar, R. (2013). Equality in cumulative voting: A systematic review with an improvement proposal. Information and Software Technology, 55(2), 267-287.

S12

Niazi, M., Ikram, N., Bano, M., Imtiaz, S., & Khan, S. U. (2013). Establishing trust in offshore software outsourcing relationships: an exploratory study using a systematic literature review. Software, IET, 7(5), 283-293.

S13

Silva, F. Q., Prikladnicki, R., França, A. C. C., Monteiro, C. V., Costa, C., & Rocha, R. (2012). An evidence‐based model of distributed software development project management: results from a systematic mapping study.Journal of software: Evolution and Process, 24(6), 625-642.

S14

Staples, M., & Niazi, M. (2007). Experiences using systematic review guidelines. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), 1425-1437.

S15

Bakar, N. H., Kasirun, Z. M., & Salleh, N. (2015). Feature extraction approaches from natural language requirements for reuse in software product lines: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 106, 132-149.

S16

González, C. A., & Cabot, J. (2014). Formal verification of static software models in MDE: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology,56(8), 821-838.

S17

Hassler, E., Carver, J. C., Hale, D., & Al-Zubidy, A. (2016). Identification of SLR tool needs–results of a community workshop. Information and Software Technology, 70, 122-129.

S18

Carver, J. C., Hassler, E., Hernandes, E., & Kraft, N. A. (2013, October). Identifying barriers to the systematic literature review process. In Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 203-212). IEEE.

S19

Al Dallal, J. (2015). Identifying refactoring opportunities in object-oriented code: A systematic literature review. Information and software Technology,58, 231-249.

S20

Zhang, H., Babar, M. A., & Tell, P. (2011). Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 53(6), 625-637.

S21

Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S., Pretorius, R., & Budgen, D. (2009, October). The impact of limited search procedures for systematic literature reviews A participant-observer case study. InProceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (pp. 336-345). IEEE Computer Society.

S22

Zarour, M., Abran, A., Desharnais, J. M., & Alarifi, A. (2015). An investigation into the best practices for the successful design and implementation of lightweight software process assessment methods: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 101, 180-192.

S23

Nidhra, S., Yanamadala, M., Afzal, W., & Torkar, R. (2013). Knowledge transfer challenges and mitigation strategies in global software development—A systematic literature review and industrial validation. International journal of information management, 33(2), 333-355.

S24

Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of systems and software, 80(4), 571-583.

S25

Petersen, K. (2011). Measuring and predicting software productivity: A systematic map and review. Information and Software Technology, 53(4), 317-343.

S27

Santiago, I., Jiménez, A., Vara, J. M., De Castro, V., Bollati, V. A., & Marcos, E. (2012). Model-Driven Engineering as a new landscape for traceability management: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 54(12), 1340-1356.

S28

Beecham, S., Baddoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H., & Sharp, H. (2008). Motivation in Software Engineering: A systematic literature review.Information and software technology, 50(9), 860-878.

S29

Hassler, E., Carver, J. C., Kraft, N. A., & Hale, D. (2014, May). Outcomes of a community workshop to identify and rank barriers to the systematic literature review process. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (p. 31). ACM.

S30

Lavallée, M., Robillard, P. N., & Mirsalari, R. (2014). Performing systematic literature reviews with novices: An iterative approach. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 57(3), 175-181.

S31

Lane, S., & Richardson, I. (2011). Process models for service-based applications: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 53(5), 424-439.

S32

Prikladnicki, R., & Audy, J. L. N. (2010). Process models in the practice of distributed software development: A systematic review of the literature.Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 779-791.

S33

Kitchenham, B. A., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M. K., Linkman, S., Pretorius, R., & Budgen, D. (2010). Refining the systematic literature review process—two participant-observer case studies. Empirical Software Engineering, 15(6), 618-653.

S35

Da Silva, F. Q., Suassuna, M., Lopes, R. F., Gouveia, T. B., França, A. C. A., de Oliveira, J. P. N., ... & Santos, A. L. (2011, September). Replication of empirical studies in software engineering: Preliminary findings from a systematic mapping study. In Replication in Empirical Software Engineering Research (RESER), 2011 Second International Workshop on (pp. 61-70). IEEE.

S36

Martínez-Ruiz, T., Münch, J., García, F., & Piattini, M. (2012). Requirements and constructors for tailoring software processes: a systematic literature review. Software Quality Journal, 20(1), 229-260.

S37

Alves, V., Niu, N., Alves, C., & Valença, G. (2010). Requirements engineering for software product lines: A systematic literature review.Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 806-820.

S38

Rabiser, R., Grünbacher, P., & Dhungana, D. (2010). Requirements for product derivation support: Results from a systematic literature review and an expert survey. Information and Software Technology, 52(3), 324-346.

S39

Rabiser, R., Grünbacher, P., & Dhungana, D. (2010). Requirements for product derivation support: Results from a systematic literature review and an expert survey. Information and Software Technology, 52(3), 324-346.

S40

Liu, D., Wang, Q., & Xiao, J. (2009, October). The role of software process simulation modeling in software risk management: A systematic review. InEmpirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2009. ESEM 2009. 3rd International Symposium on (pp. 302-311). IEEE.

S41

de Almeida Biolchini, J. C., Mian, P. G., Natali, A. C. C., Conte, T. U., & Travassos, G. H. (2007). Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 21(2), 133-151.

S42

Da Silva, F. Q., Santos, A. L., Soares, S., França, A. C. C., Monteiro, C. V., & Maciel, F. F. (2011). Six years of systematic literature reviews in software engineering: An updated tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 53(9), 899-913.

S43

Fernández-Sáez, A. M., Bocco, M. G., & Romero, F. P. (2010, July). SLR-Tool: A Tool for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews. In ICSOFT (2)(pp. 157-166).

S44

Bowes, D., Hall, T., & Beecham, S. (2012, September). SLuRp: a tool to help large complex systematic literature reviews deliver valid and rigorous results. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Evidential assessment of software technologies (pp. 33-36). ACM.

S45

Savolainen, P., Ahonen, J. J., & Richardson, I. (2012). Software development project success and failure from the supplier's perspective: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management,30(4), 458-469.

S46

Radjenović, D., Heričko, M., Torkar, R., & Živkovič, A. (2013). Software fault prediction metrics: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 55(8), 1397-1418.

S47

Zhang, H., Kitchenham, B., & Pfahl, D. (2010). Software process simulation modeling: an extended systematic review. In New Modeling Concepts for Today’s Software Processes (pp. 309-320). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

S48

Barney, S., Petersen, K., Svahnberg, M., Aurum, A., & Barney, H. (2012). Software quality trade-offs: A systematic map. Information and Software Technology, 54(7), 651-662.

S49

Pitangueira, A. M., Maciel, R. S. P., & Barros, M. (2015). Software requirements selection and prioritization using SBSE approaches: A systematic review and mapping of the literature. Journal of Systems and Software, 103, 267-280.

S50

Luna, A. J. D. O., Kruchten, P., Pedrosa, M. L. D. E., Neto, H. R., & de Moura, H. P. (2014). State of the Art of Agile Governance: A Systematic Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1922.

S51

Tosi, D., & Morasca, S. (2015). Supporting the semi-automatic semantic annotation of web services: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 61, 16-32.

S52

Wen, J., Li, S., Lin, Z., Hu, Y., & Huang, C. (2012). Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models. Information and Software Technology, 54(1), 41-59.

S53

Inayat, I., Salim, S. S., Marczak, S., Daneva, M., & Shamshirband, S. (2015). A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges. Computers in human behavior, 51, 915-929.

S54

Calderón, A., & Ruiz, M. (2015). A systematic literature review on serious games evaluation: An application to software project management.Computers & Education, 87, 396-422.

S55

Ali, N. B., Petersen, K., & Wohlin, C. (2014). A systematic literature review on the industrial use of software process simulation. Journal of Systems and Software, 97, 65-85.

S56

Sharafi, Z., Soh, Z., & Guéhéneuc, Y. G. (2015). A systematic literature review on the usage of eye-tracking in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 67, 79-107.

S57

Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 792-805.

S58

Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012, September). Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. In Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement (pp. 29-38). ACM.

S59

Lopez-Herrejon, R. E., Linsbauer, L., & Egyed, A. (2015). A systematic mapping study of search-based software engineering for software product lines. Information and Software Technology, 61, 33-51.

S60

Holl, G., Grünbacher, P., & Rabiser, R. (2012). A systematic review and an expert survey on capabilities supporting multi product lines. Information and Software Technology, 54(8), 828-852.

S61

Domı, E., Pérez, B., & Rubio, Á. L. (2012). A systematic review of code generation proposals from state machine specifications. Information and Software Technology, 54(10), 1045-1066.

S62

Ali, M. S., Babar, M. A., Chen, L., & Stol, K. J. (2010). A systematic review of comparative evidence of aspect-oriented programming. Information and software Technology, 52(9), 871-887.

S63

Chen, L., & Babar, M. A. (2011). A systematic review of evaluation of variability management approaches in software product lines. Information and Software Technology, 53(4), 344-362.

S64

Singh, K., Singh, P., & Kumar, K. (2016). A systematic review of IP traceback schemes for denial of service attacks. Computers & Security, 56, 111-139.

S65

Staples, M., & Niazi, M. (2008). Systematic review of organizational motivations for adopting CMM-based SPI. Information and software technology, 50(7), 605-620.

S66

Shahin, M., Liang, P., & Babar, M. A. (2014). A systematic review of software architecture visualization techniques. Journal of Systems and Software, 94, 161-185.

S67

Kitchenham, B., & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 55(12), 2049-2075.

S68

Ali, S., Briand, L. C., Hemmati, H., & Panesar-Walawege, R. K. (2010). A systematic review of the application and empirical investigation of search-based test case generation. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on,36(6), 742-762.

S69

Tahir, A., Tosi, D., & Morasca, S. (2013). A systematic review on the functional testing of semantic web services. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(11), 2877-2889.

S70

Bano, M., & Zowghi, D. (2015). A systematic review on the relationship between user involvement and system success. Information and Software Technology, 58, 148-169.

S71

Zhang, H., & Babar, M. A. (2013). Systematic reviews in software engineering: An empirical investigation. Information and Software Technology, 55(7), 1341-1354.

S72

Marshall, C., & Brereton, P. (2013, October). Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A mapping study. In Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 296-299). IEEE.

S73

Marshall, C., Brereton, P., & Kitchenham, B. (2014, May). Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: A feature analysis. InProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (p. 13). ACM.

S74

Portillo-Rodríguez, J., Vizcaíno, A., Piattini, M., & Beecham, S. (2012). Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review.Information and Software Technology, 54(7), 663-685.

S75

Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 53(8), 789-817.

S76

dos Santos Rocha, R., & Fantinato, M. (2013). The use of software product lines for business process management: A systematic literature review.Information and Software Technology, 55(8), 1355-1373.

S77

Seriai, A., Benomar, O., Cerat, B., & Sahraoui, H. (2014, September). Validation of Software Visualization Tools: A Systematic Mapping Study. InSoftware Visualization (VISSOFT), 2014 Second IEEE Working Conference on (pp. 60-69). IEEE.

S78

Mahdavi-Hezavehi, S., Galster, M., & Avgeriou, P. (2013). Variability in quality attributes of service-based software systems: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 55(2), 320-343.

S79

Malheiros, V., Hohn, E., Pinho, R., & Mendonca, M. (2007, September). A visual text mining approach for systematic reviews. In Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2007. ESEM 2007. First International Symposium on (pp. 245-254). IEEE.                               

S80

Ramampiaro, H., Cruzes, D., Conradi, R., & Mendona, M. (2010, October). Supporting evidence-based Software Engineering with collaborative information retrieval. In Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom), 2010 6th International Conference on(pp. 1-5). IEEE.

S81

Yang, Z., Li, Z., Jin, Z., & Chen, Y. (2014). A systematic literature review of requirements modeling and analysis for self-adaptive systems. InRequirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (pp. 55-71). Springer International Publishing.

S82

Chagas, L. F., de Carvalho, D. D., Lima, A. M., & Reis, C. A. L. (2014). Systematic literature review on the characteristics of Agile project management in the context of maturity models. In Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (pp. 177-189). Springer International Publishing.

S83

Pons, C., Giandini, R., & Arévalo, G. (2012). A systematic review of applying modern software engineering techniques to developing robotic systems. Ingeniería e Investigación, 32(1), 58-63.

S84

Raza, B., MacDonell, S. G., & Clear, T. (2013). Topics and treatments in global software engineering research-A systematic snapshot.

S85

Ruiz‐Rube, I., Dodero, J. M., Palomo‐Duarte, M., Ruiz, M., & Gawn, D. (2013). Uses and applications of Software & Systems Process Engineering Meta‐Model process models. A systematic mapping study. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 25(9), 999-1025.

S86

Hernandes, E., Zamboni, A., Fabbri, S., & Thommazo, A. D. (2012). Using GQM and TAM to evaluate StArt-a tool that supports Systematic Review.CLEI Electronic Journal, 15(1), 3-3.